
However, there is very little skill, strategy or planning associated with being the manager of these Boston Red Sox. The lineup and pitching rotation pretty much fill-in themselves. Theo Epstein, the general manager, is going to sign and draft the players, and the players performance has very little to do with the manager's actions. The most a manager has to do is determine how to use the bullpen, which comes with precedent. For example, the Red Sox are playing the Milwaukee Brewers and are leading 3-2 in the 8th inning with 2 outs and runners on 1st and 3rd. Prince Fielder, a dominant left-handed hitter is coming to bat with a right handed pitcher on the mound. It has been embedded in the fabric of the game that the manager should pull the right-hander and put a lefty in to face Fielder. This move is not part of any individual innovation by any particular manager. They have been the accepted maneuver throughout generations.
Compared to the other coaching jobs in Boston, the Red Sox managerial job may be the easiest, in terms of strategy and maneuvers. Bill Belichick, the New England Patriots coach, has to devise a different strategy for every game. Sometimes, he has to account for a dominating running game. Other times a great quarterback or an elite defense. Doc Rivers, the coach of the Boston Celtics, had to figure out the best way to utilize three future Hall of Famers who had carried teams alone throughout their entire careers. Last, Boston Bruins coach Claude Julien won the 2011 Stanley Cup without a dominant offensive player (nobody scored more than 62 points). He rode gritty play, physical dominance, the best goalie in hockey, and the most imposing defenseman to ever play the game to a title.
People say that being the Red Sox manager is one of the most sought after jobs in sports. They also say that it is tough. I have to disagree.
I'm curious what you think about the Celtics and the NBA in general.
ReplyDelete